React Native App Development Company
React Native's advantage is rarely technical. It is that your existing React developers can work on the mobile app, and that a large amount of logic can be shared with your web codebase. For most companies already using React, that settles the decision.
Discuss your projectExpo or bare React Native
The first real decision, and the one most often made by accident. Expo has changed considerably — the old advice that serious apps must eject is out of date.
| Expo | Bare React Native | |
|---|---|---|
| Setup and build tooling | Managed for you | You own Xcode and Gradle config |
| Native modules | A large supported set, plus config plugins | Anything, with native work |
| Over-the-air updates | Built in | Needs separate setup |
| Build service | Hosted builds without a Mac | Your own CI, Mac needed for iOS |
| Upgrades | Noticeably easier | The hardest part of the framework |
| Suits | Most apps, including commercial ones | Deep native integration, existing native app |
We would start new projects on Expo unless there is a specific reason not to. The common objection — that you cannot use native modules — no longer holds for most cases. Bare is right when you are adding React Native to an existing native app, or when you depend on a module with no Expo support.
What we build
Apps alongside a React web product
Where validation, API clients, types and business rules are shared between web and mobile. The strongest case for React Native and a genuine saving on every future feature.
Consumer and customer apps
Accounts, booking, ordering, loyalty. Standard interface patterns that both platforms handle well through native components.
Offline-capable field apps
A local database with a sync layer, plus camera and barcode use. Well supported, with the conflict rules agreed per record type rather than defaulted.
Adding mobile to an existing native app
React Native screens inside an app that is already native, which is a legitimate incremental path and a bare-workflow case.
Upgrades, and why they matter before you start
React Native's weakest point historically has been upgrading between versions. A project left alone for eighteen months is genuinely difficult to bring current, because the framework, its native build configuration and a long chain of community packages all have to move together, and some of those packages will have been abandoned.
So we treat version currency as ongoing maintenance rather than an occasional project: upgrade regularly in small steps, keep the dependency list short, and check that anything we depend on is actively maintained before adopting it. A package that saves a week now and is abandoned next year costs considerably more than a week later.
The framework's New Architecture — the rewritten rendering and native-module layers — is now the default for new projects and most well-maintained libraries support it. For an older app, moving to it is a real piece of work, and we would scope it honestly rather than describing it as an upgrade.
Common questions
Related in Mobile App Development
Tell us what you need
Describe the problem and we will come back with scope, timeline, and a rate. No obligation to proceed.
Get in touch